<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jeremy&#039;s Blog &#187; OmniFocus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeremysblog.co.uk/tag/omnifocus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeremysblog.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 12:28:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>OmniFocus v Things</title>
		<link>http://jeremysblog.co.uk/software/omnifocus-v-things/</link>
		<comments>http://jeremysblog.co.uk/software/omnifocus-v-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 07:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mac Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OmniFocus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Task Mangement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Things]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeremysblog.co.uk/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve recently felt that it was about time I got round to using some kind of computer-based task management system and, since I&#8217;ve found the To Do features in iCal and Apple Mail to be pretty useless, I began looking around for something more effective. I briefly used Remember the Milk, a web-based offering that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-113" title="OmniFocus Icon" src="http://jeremysblog.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/jb_omnifocus_icon.jpg" alt="OmniFocus Icon" width="147" height="147" />I&#8217;ve recently felt that it was about time I got round to using some kind of computer-based task management system and, since I&#8217;ve found the To Do features in iCal and Apple Mail to be pretty useless, I began looking around for something more effective. I briefly used <a href="http://www.rememberthemilk.com/">Remember the Milk</a>, a web-based offering that makes a reasonable fist of the job (particularly given that it is a free service), but it wasn&#8217;t long before I felt that I needed something more powerful.</p>
<p>Having heard lots of good feedback about <a href="http://www.omnigroup.com/applications/omnifocus/">OmniFocus</a>, particularly from <a href="http://www.macsparky.com/">David Sparks</a> of the excellent <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?id=314134853">Mac Power Users</a> podcast, I thought I&#8217;d give it a go. After a couple of days playing with the trial version, and some time spent watching a couple of helpful screencasts, I was soon sold on this solution and I bought myself a licence.</p>
<p>Just a couple of days later I read a post on David Sparks&#8217; blog that prompted me to check out a competitor to OmniFocus called <a href="http://culturedcode.com/things/">Things</a>. Things, it turns out, has a rather lovely user interface and it has to be said that it looks more elegant than OmniFocus. Being a sucker for things that look nice, I found myself feeling annoyed at myself for having so quickly committed myself to OmniFocus. More in hope than anticipation, I sent an email to the OmniGroup asking whether they would consider refunding my licence and explaining that I had only just stumbled upon Things. Rather surprisingly, given the fact that I mentioned how my head had been turned by the UI of Things, they agreed to do so and wished me luck in testing out the competitor. I immediately felt guilty for betraying the friendly OmniGroup people and wondered whether I had made the right decision.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-114" title="Things Icon" src="http://jeremysblog.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/jb_things_icon.jpg" alt="Things Icon" width="147" height="147" />Before getting a response from the OmniGroup I had fired off an email to Cultured Code (the developers of Things), explaining how I&#8217;d recently bought a licence for OmniFocus and that I&#8217;d since discovered Things. I told them of my love-at-first-sight experience of Things and brazenly asked whether they would consider giving me a discount on the purchase price (remember that at this point I hadn&#8217;t had a response from the OmniGroup). I received a very friendly reply, stating that they would be very glad to have me as a Things user, thanking me for my &#8216;kind words&#8217; about their UI and offering me a 20% off coupon.</p>
<p>I now found myself feeling indebted to both the OmniGroup and Cultured Code, since they had both been so very friendly and accommodating. However I decided that I really needed to carry out a more thorough exploration of Things before finally making up my mind about which of the two task managers would actually meet my needs best.</p>
<p>Deep down I knew that I shouldn&#8217;t be too swayed by a glamourous UI as there is so much more to an application than the way it looks, and so I started to put Things through its paces. Before too long a glaring flaw became apparent. Whilst OmniFocus allowed me to easily sync my tasks between multiple computers (vital for me as I work from my home office iMac as well as my work-based counterpart), Things didn&#8217;t offer any such option. I sent another email to Cultured Code enquiring about this. They promptly replied and told me that &#8220;doing over-the-air (Internet) syncing&#8221; is a top priority for future releases. They even teased me with the promise that they intended to do it better than in competitor apps. This, I concluded was all well and good, but since I needed a solution that worked for me today, rather than one that might work even better but that I couldn&#8217;t have until sometime in the future, I decided to settle on OmniFocus and I sent off yet another email.</p>
<p>This time the email was addressed to the OmniGroup, asking them whether they would consider having me back, even though I had considered cheating on them. They, of course, welcomed me back with open arms and I am now an avid and very satisfied user of OmniFocus. Yes, it still rankles a little that Things has a nicer UI and a more seductive application icon, but ultimately I know that I&#8217;ve made the right choice.</p>
<p>Aside from the syncing issue, I also found that the Things approach to organising tasks was less intuitive (at least for me) and didn&#8217;t seem to conform so well to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getting_Things_Done">Getting Things Done</a> method which both apps are intended to accommodate. The various views and &#8216;perspectives&#8217; offered by OmniFocus just seem to suit my way of organising tasks much better. I guess I will keep one eye on Things, just to see how it evolves (both apps are still in their first major release stage) but for now I remain an enthusiastic user of OmniFocus and would recommend it highly to anyone who needs something beyond a basic task manager.</p>
<p>If you want to learn more about either of the apps then I recommend that you check out the free screencasts listed below. More than anything this whole experience has confirmed for me what a nice bunch of folks these small Mac developers are &#8211; both Cultured Code and the OmniGroup made me feel like they cared about me as a customer and that is an experience that is increasingly rare.</p>
<p><strong>Learn more about OmniFocus &amp; Things with these screencasts:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.screencastsonline.com/index_files/SCO0178-omnifocusbasics.php">OmniFocus Basics screencast</a> at ScreenCastsOnline<br />
<a href="http://www.screencastsonline.com/index_files/SCO0180-omnifocuspt2.php">Advanced OmniFocus &amp; iPhone Client screencast</a> at ScreenCastsOnline<br />
<a href="http://www.screencastsonline.com/index_files/SCO0217-thingspt1.php">Things &#8211; Part 1 screencast</a> at ScreenCastsOnline<br />
<a href="http://culturedcode.com/things/screencast.html">Things screencast</a> from Cultured Code</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jeremysblog.co.uk/software/omnifocus-v-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
